My musings
Spirituality
Monday, 8 August 2011
Friday, 22 July 2011
Be Characterless
)Be Characterless
There is so much emphasis placed on character. I see quite a few people refer to the importance of character in being true to themselves.When we go for work, our character is verified. When we arrange marriages, character is verified. The outer world is huge on character. It needs facts, logic.
But, in the inner journey this obssession with character is a hindrance. Character is an off shoot of mind. Mind keeps clinging into the past and projecting into the future.
A person who is particular about his character projects himself in a way accepted, appreciated by the society so that others see him as predictable and safe to be around with.
But when one is aware, responds spontaneously, he is meditative. He does not operate out of fixed ideologies and principles. He is natural and not bothered about being seen as "normal".
When a man places emphasis on character in spiritual realm, he takes great care to lead a simple life, to be seen as pious. This very effort to be seen as simple only strengthens the ego.
A person who is aware, true does not care one way or the other. If he has comforts, he does not shun them, nor does he cling. He does not possess his possessions. He lives with no effort. So even in luxury, he lives simply. But a person who takes pains to lead an austere life lives a complex life in his simple avatar.
Truth has no requirements, no principles, no ideologies. It is characterless
Life is not a straight line- my musings
Life is not a straight line_ my musings
Life is not a straight line. It has beautiful curves, many twists and turns. Some musings:
When one is busy gathering knowledge from various sources, trying to get answers to questiions, one is able to share his knowledge with others easily.
But when one has known something, when something has become intrinsic to one he finds it almost impossible to express in words what he knows from his core. But the need to share is so tremendous that he shares at the cost of being misunderstood.
When one gains fame for his work, and starts identifying with it, he stops being himself. All that he does has an imaginary audience. The witness in him then goes in hiding in the din of the applause of this audience. Then the work is like plastic flower, perfect,beautiful, but without fragrance.
If he remains unidentified with fame, then the witness in him , his own pure awareness guides him, to continue to be creative. Then his work really flowers, with a fragrance of its own, even if all may not love the fragrance.
When one is radiating love, he does so, only by not hating. For love is who each one is. It is not acquired from outside. But when the mirror is cleaned, it shines in its true glory.
The more one seeks the crowd, the more one is lonely.
The one who is comfortable with one's aloneness, solitude, is the one who is at home everywhere in the crowd and when alone.
The more one gives, the more he gets without aiming to get.
The more he keeps grabbing the more emptier he feels.
At the peak of knowing, a man realizes that he knows nothing. It is said that when one has climbed the highest peak of the mountain he realizes that he has just begun to climb.
Rules are for man. Man is not for rules.
Money is for man. Man is not for money.
The man who is certain about everything has no clarity. He is confused when he faces the unknown, uncertain element. The man who has clarity is never certain about any thing. For life is uncertain. One who knows this has clarity in uncertainty.
The one who exclaims "holy cow" often knows nothing about holiness. The one who is not self righteous, has tremendous respect for the entire universe, even to those who hate or judge him.
To sum up, life is inclusive. All polarities merge and meet. Day meets night and night meets day in twilight and dusk, good turns evil and evil turns good. The master has the seed of the wretched in him, the evil has the potential to be a master in him
Being and doing
BEING AND DOING
All the great masters were who they were- the enlightened beings and from this place of being who they were, they spoke.
But their followers focused more on their preachings and emphasized on the dos and donts and missed the significance of being who you are.
So the list was something like do charity, keep a fast, say the prayers.
But their followers focused more on their preachings and emphasized on the dos and donts and missed the significance of being who you are.
So the list was something like do charity, keep a fast, say the prayers.
But, if the heart is not generous, the charity can be manipulative. For instance it can be just hype to create a brand name or for any other ulterior motive.
If the fasting is done by a toiling labourer who can hardly afford two square meals a day, then the hours of his fasting are filled with desire for food.
If the prayer is from a heart full of greed or bitterness, the prayer will be for fulfilling more greedy demands or for wishing the downfall of a perceived enemy. This is no prayer. If the being is grateful and aware, then his life becomes a prayer, all that he does is prayerful.
So, first be who you are and let the doing follow. It can never be that you do to be. Normally we wish that we had something, then with that we do something and with that doing we be something. But it is the reverse. First we be, then out of this being we do and as a byproduct we attain.
If we are loving then all that we do becomes love.
If we are responsible, then we do responsible deeds.
So doing follows being and not the other way round.
If the fasting is done by a toiling labourer who can hardly afford two square meals a day, then the hours of his fasting are filled with desire for food.
If the prayer is from a heart full of greed or bitterness, the prayer will be for fulfilling more greedy demands or for wishing the downfall of a perceived enemy. This is no prayer. If the being is grateful and aware, then his life becomes a prayer, all that he does is prayerful.
So, first be who you are and let the doing follow. It can never be that you do to be. Normally we wish that we had something, then with that we do something and with that doing we be something. But it is the reverse. First we be, then out of this being we do and as a byproduct we attain.
If we are loving then all that we do becomes love.
If we are responsible, then we do responsible deeds.
So doing follows being and not the other way round.
Detached, or disinterested?
DETACHED, OR DISINTERESTED?
Many people use the word "detachment" in spiritual parlance to imply life devoid of any enjoyment, any desire. They equate life to prison term, this body as a bondage. There is almost a fear of life, and of anything that can give happiness or pleasure. Detachment, to them, also means disinterested in people, in particular to familyBut I feel that such disinterest is indifference. Life then becomes dull as it loses its sparkle. Our body and mind are our vehicles in this plane. When we are true and sensitive, we listen to them from our heart and then there is no chance of abusing either. Both will then serve us as they are meant to. They become masters only when we are asleep or unaware.
Detachment goes beyond attachment and indifference. If we choose attachment, at some point indifference sets in. If we choose indifference, attachment is suppressed and comes out in some way. If nothing, it becomes attached to the concept of detachment.
Detachment happens when one lives with awareness, when one is true to the moment or to what the moment brings. Welcome the moment, but no clinging to it when it is gone. No deliberate anlysis or dissection. If insights come, listen. But no conscious looking for lessons to learn.
Detachment does not distance one from people. One feels close to the entire existence and to all. One enjoys what life offers, but with the awareness that we own nothing, even if we happen to own it legally. Apparently life remains the same. But inwardly, there is a different quality as there is gratitude, but no clinging.
Having specific friendships do not matter much as one is friendly always. Otherwise most friendships or relationships become trade offs.
May be, that is why they have ships in the word "friendship" and "relationship". But if we are friendly and relate, one is loving without agenda.
Life without intensity is less like life and more like death. Detachment is when one stops identifying with events and people. This zen saying sums it up well:
"If you come, you are welcome.
If you go, we do not pursue"
I want to say, "Beware of indifference."
The extraodinary is in the ordinary
The extraordinary is in the ordinary
We keep looking for something to take our attention away from our mundane daily lives, something to alllevikate our boredom. Taking breaks, vacations, all help, but only temporarily.Ultimately, we have to live our daily lives and more importantly, live with our selves.If we remain aware,every moment, every person, every job will become interesting for us.Every moment will be creative and not an automatic reenactment of previous actions.
If we are efficient at office work, cleaning, cooking, exercising, our efficiency should not make us do every thing like a robot. At the beginning of learning any of these, we were aware, as we were yet to learn. Then we became robotic after learning. If we do the same job with awareness, it becomes interesting.
The same goes for our relationships too. We are interested only when we are getting to know a person. Once we are familiar, we switch to auto mode and take the other for granted. This is especially true for our family. Awareness transforms our speech, deeds and words. Relationships remain interesting without "working" on them.
Food is another aspect. We eat our meals, sip our tea without mindfulness. If we are aware, our body gives many signals, we can hear what it says. We cannot, then have cravings for eating or be gluttons. We eat when we there is hunger and know to stop as soon as we are full. Simple meals become grand feasts. Less becomes more.
There is gratitude for every thing and every one and life becomes the gift that it is!
Givers and receivers
Givers and receivers
Kahlil Gibran, had in "The Prophet said,
"You give little when you give of your possessions
It is when you give of yourself that you truly give
For what are your possessions, but things you keep and guard for fear
we may need them tomorrow?"
WE all are givers or receivers sometime in our lives, many times we are both, simultaneously.
Much is made of giving.
Some people give for the joy of givng.
Others give because it is written in the scriptures. They believe it is holy to give and you will attain to heaven if you give.
Some give as it gives their ego a boost.They gain respectability and are seen as virtuous.
But, then some give because, they know not how not to give. They give, not even for the joy of giving, or let alone for any other reason, but because they know not how not to give. They just feel that they are overflowing with abundance and that they must deliver. When they do find some one to receive, they do not bother to judge if the receiver deserves the gift. They know that they are just a channel for givng. It is the universe that gives and gives, unconditionally. They do not reflect or contemplate after givng.
To quote Gibran again,
"And you receivers,
and you are all receivers.
Assume no weight of gratitude,
lest you lay a yoke upon
yourself and upon him who gives
Rather rise together with the giver on his gifts as on wings
For to be over mindful of his gift is to doubt his generosity
who has the free hearted earth for mother and god for father"
What is a giver without a receiver? There is no need to feel bonded or indebted when we receive a gift. Some of us receive a gift and remain anxious till we manage to give a gift in return.Accept gracefully. But do not make it a trade that he has given and we have to give back only because he has given. That takes away from the beauty and grace of givng. Gratitude is there. But let that be all there is.Let us not feel that receivng is a burden.
Let us not distort or color the givng and receiving with the ego of the giver or the burden of the receiver
Kahlil Gibran, had in "The Prophet said,
"You give little when you give of your possessions
It is when you give of yourself that you truly give
For what are your possessions, but things you keep and guard for fear
we may need them tomorrow?"
WE all are givers or receivers sometime in our lives, many times we are both, simultaneously.
Much is made of giving.
Some people give for the joy of givng.
Others give because it is written in the scriptures. They believe it is holy to give and you will attain to heaven if you give.
Some give as it gives their ego a boost.They gain respectability and are seen as virtuous.
But, then some give because, they know not how not to give. They give, not even for the joy of giving, or let alone for any other reason, but because they know not how not to give. They just feel that they are overflowing with abundance and that they must deliver. When they do find some one to receive, they do not bother to judge if the receiver deserves the gift. They know that they are just a channel for givng. It is the universe that gives and gives, unconditionally. They do not reflect or contemplate after givng.
To quote Gibran again,
"And you receivers,
and you are all receivers.
Assume no weight of gratitude,
lest you lay a yoke upon
yourself and upon him who gives
Rather rise together with the giver on his gifts as on wings
For to be over mindful of his gift is to doubt his generosity
who has the free hearted earth for mother and god for father"
What is a giver without a receiver? There is no need to feel bonded or indebted when we receive a gift. Some of us receive a gift and remain anxious till we manage to give a gift in return.Accept gracefully. But do not make it a trade that he has given and we have to give back only because he has given. That takes away from the beauty and grace of givng. Gratitude is there. But let that be all there is.Let us not feel that receivng is a burden.
Let us not distort or color the givng and receiving with the ego of the giver or the burden of the receiver
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)